Rouillier - News
This serious charge of obstruction of justice is brought jointly against Mr. Jacques Rouillier Montreal and involve Mr. David Bouchard and Jean-Francois Bouvette Trois-Rivieres. All three attorneys general of the time, Jacques P. Dupuis.
is by inference to be deduced that the latter assumed that in addition to these known functions, those of Minister of "insecurity" when the public prosecution has been initiated following an illegal arrest ordered by him to the director of the SPVM which then ordered the S / D Serge Messier SPVM to its execution order. A criminal charge
joint obstruction of justice (Article 139 (2) CC) brought to the location of three prosecutors mentioned above, should eventually be submitted for processing by a Provincial Court other than the Court of Québec.
This accusation is irrefutable fact justified by some other prosecutor or judge that they were literally themselves pilloried in place of the OIQ and Council Press in their malicious prosecution, senseless and redundant enterprises, it seems, for their benefit.
In a case involving tortuous and lapidary Ghavitian Zaki, president of the Ordre des ingénieurs du Québec, the prosecutor Jacques Rouillier adopted an attitude confirming thinly veiled desire to continue Daniel Bedard arbitrary or unfair to the Institution justice and fairness of the law.
Closing outrageously eye vis-à-vis such an attitude moribund yet for their own image and ethics, several judges of the Court of Quebec have followed since my arrest without warrant and without cause on 19 November 2007 to probably make this issue a parody with no name. A play which certainly does happen, however, the legal history as a masterpiece in the art of administering said "pillar" of an institution. An institution
sensible adopt strict rules to lead by example regarding compliance with laws. Rules of ethics have also been severely violated by judges who have lost control in all likelihood, the preservation of the image of the institution. Leaving them strangely be spread by the accused deeply disturbed to see the judge and assign its responsibilities in the hands of prosecutors and those of the defense. Which play complacently then to constantly questioning the judgments already rendered by these judges to defer to voluntary and termination procedures. And all this, ignominiously traded immeasurable harm to the accused but to their own benefit indecent common.
Remember, a guest of the Law Society of Quebec during October 2, 2008, former Minister of Justice, Gil Remillard, called this institution "pillar" to emphasize the 20-year history of the Court of Quebec since its birth in 1988.
Several serious mistakes in pursuit confirm the original intent of dishonest Me Rouillier hinder the normal course of justice.
principal noted that the status of 'unfitness to appear "continued to be supported so petty unfairly by the prosecutor despite first good decision: either that of Justice Louise Villemure of the Court of Quebec , one month after my arrest, acknowledged my aptitude November 18, 2007 and dismissed with the back of the hand, the psychiatric report prepared by Dr. John Wolwertz Pinel Institute and did the same with respect to his testimony at the Court. By
same legal principles, the trial would be held within a reasonable time following the decision of the judge Villemure.
Without even appeal the decision of the judge Villemure, Me Rouillier clearly supported in its disgraceful maneuver by Mr. David Bouchard Trois-Rivieres, sank into a parallel proceeding is not justified by any tangible evidence whatsoever and trampling turn section 672.23 (2) of the Criminal Code.
The relevance of my private criminal prosecution against 3 Crown Prosecutors is also a justified reaction J. Vezina Court of Appeal in Quebec, which was deeply shocked by the behavior of Mr. Jean-François Bouvet, who came to replace Mr. David Bouchard, who was lying to him blatantly in the face.
Indeed, he told the panel formed Chamberland, and Giroux, that the judge had recognized Villemure "unfit" in Montreal when it was false.
J. Vezina then reminded him that the accused had reason to be worried by such disorderly conduct further comprising probably the memory of Mr. Bouvette as well as hacks confirmed that the issue of fitness to appear on the contrary had already been settled December 18, 2008.
11 months of detention called "preventive" and proved to have been justified even after the trial judge's Villemure given along with the fact that under the rules established sentencing, this time "preventive" double counting.
Judgement of the Court of Appeal of 27 October 2008 also points out that a maximum sentence of six months imprisonment is foreseen in the Criminal Code when elected as prosecutor David Bouchard has done Three Rivers to continue by way of summary. So what
major procedural defect in the prosecution confirmed already caused me 20 months of detention totally unjustified. Which necessarily result in exemplary damages compliance with Article 49 of the Charter because there was so manifest, for dishonest and misleading about the part of Mr. Bouvette with intent to deceive 3 judges of the highest court in Quebec for end to increase the damage to my place and the costs incurred for travel Mtl-Trois-Rivieres in knowing me obviously unemployed and without means.
This could even lead to a stay of proceedings on the charge of harassment still curiously kept unsightly redundant in Trois-Rivieres as President of the Press Council, Mr Raymond Corriveau would likely have filed the criminal complaint in the same period as the end of support from Mr. Zaki Ghavitian.
recall that Dr. Pierre Mailloux, a psychiatrist has developed an expertise-cons to the effect that I was obviously a capable person to appear and not suffering from any mental illness whatsoever and was here in that 10 and 11 November 2008 before Judge Jean-Pierre Boyer and then on December 10 before the Review Board.
Notwithstanding the ruling in favor of the Boyer report Mailloux and the decision of the Commission to review same certification, Mr. David Bouchard probably supported in this direction by the Attorney General, was obstinate in maintaining conditions of release by which I had to respect my appointment with my doctor in charge, Dr. Mailloux and follow its recommendations.
Logically, Dr. Mailloux has been differently interpreted the deep desire of the Crown to treat me like that with respect to benefits negative psycho-social of the judicial harassment of which I was received since 1 April 2005 or the date of my first arrest and illegal abuse.
Accordingly, Dr. Mailloux has filed a form 10 March 2009 in order to require the " Ministry of Employment and Social Solidarity , the retroactive payment of enhanced benefits from the observation of hard Judicial making me unable to hold any employment psychological whatsoever since that date as well as for the next twelve months because of aggressive and confirmed by prosecutors themselves.
The Department has responded to the rebate but not the retroactive payment and this has resulted in more than a legitimate challenge in these circumstances. For how that ministry shows me there be social solidarity among its victims carefully chosen and on which the government is going when necessary ...
continued ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment