To put in context: http://www.garscontent.com/2009/Quart% 202/04-Avril/16/Pinel.wmv and then:
Judge for yourself: The first 3 extracts are those of "expertise" ordered by the Court at the Institut Philippe Pinel, and more precisely controlled to Dr. Jacques Talbot.
"I have come to the firm opinion that the criteria on the issue of fitness to appear majority, if not totally at fault, because of the existence in this patient of morbid psychiatric problems the order or paranoid personality disorder or paranoia order characterized "
forensic opinion of Dr. Jacques Talbot, psychiatrist Philippe Pinel Institute of Montreal Report
August 8, 2006 (after my acquittal by a jury of 11 people June 21, 2006)
"It now provides an array of clinical psychotic, paranoid or grandiose, while judicial proceedings are essentially included in this delusional system. Most, if not all the criteria on the issue of fitness to appear are at fault "
Opinion forensic Dr. Jacques Talbot
Report November 22, 2007
" I conclude that Mr. has a psychotic disorder of a register. The diagnosis was that of paranoid delusional disorder or paranoid. The disorder involves a disruption in the testing of reality and disorders major trial. This condition makes it unfit to appear on Mr. thereby depriving their right to be tried. The natural history of this disease without treatment is likely to persist and increase in severity. "
Opinion diagnosis of Dr. Jacques Talbot
of March 18, 2008 who served Richard J. Poudrier, JCQ Trois-Rivières to endorse so mean and brutal and cold blooded, the March 20, 2008, an order of Proposed treatment until February 2010 without it being substantiated in any way in respect of the provisions of Article 672.23 (2) the Criminal Code. In
disturbing paradox and after psychiatrist Pierre Mailloux has agreed to my ability to appear in his psychiatric report dated 14 October 2008 and have testified in my favor, 10 and 11 November 2008 before Judge Jean-Pierre Boyer and reoffend December 10, 2008 before the Review Board of Mental Disorders, J. Matte wanting to be mean-spirited to me and insult the intelligence of Dr. Pierre Mailloux much as mine, I probably without plan ahead this time, instead rendering service sent me an additional 7 days to Pinel ordering another psychiatric evaluation February 10, 2009 during my first appearance before the judge.
because the expertise of Dr. Kim Bedard-Charette, also a psychiatrist at the Pinel Institute, and produced following the order of Judge Rolande Matte (Matte Case ) Which was so petty and without justified reason, decided that the "inability I always hung nose " concludes, on the contrary, in my ability to appear. It rubs, moreover, the same evaluation unit H-3, his colleague Dr. Jacques Talbot, with whom she shares the task of " orders made by the Court's requests for psychiatric evaluations of subjects "
Amazingly, without even trying to support the expertise of his colleagues spent the psychiatrist" clashes "surely to the chagrin of 3 of his colleagues and put on the spot by itself by stating in his expert prepared, like the one Dr. Mailloux, with a great desire for objectivity is adjourning for the first time the true content of my speech without by cons and in turn not mention anything about the derogation in Article 672.26b Criminal Code by J. Bourque. Thus passing, in turn, to dodge the issue:
"It is strange that psychiatry, which wants a science which studies human behavior, can say everything and its opposite, depending on time and the person which assesses. How can it be found ill on one side and in full possession of his abilities on the other. He complains of the College of Physicians, a band of charlatans who would spend more energy to defend its members than the population "
Later she will say:
" Note that on several occasions in the prior record of the subject, he mentioned the existence in him a form of delusional disorder persecutory. Now, sir has given us access to interview any material allowing us to conclude the presence of this disorder in his delirious, if it existed, would certainly be encapsulated. "
But I think the only thing that was encapsulated in my body was the 2-25mg of Seroquel that I took on a voluntary basis every night for my 600 a few days of arbitrary detention at Pinel. And this, to help me sleep and try to accept my situation to say the least strange. In addition, Dr. Pierre Mailloux support in his testimony that a dose as low antipsychotic even taken on a regular basis could not overcome a delirium paranoid on the order of paranoia characterized as described previously Dr. Talbot in its very first "expertise-can" of August 8, 2006.
This proves "beyond a reasonable doubt" for dishonest Pinel mission ordered by the Court itself behind this act of malfeasance in the collusive purpose of making me downright obvious harm sheer pettiness .
Although it has proven different from his colleagues and 80% intellectually honest, the psychiatrist Kim Bedard-Charette guilty by the same alleged misconduct by the Dr. Mailloux Dr. Lyne Beauchemin of the Ste-Thérèse Shawinigan using " we " mentions in his end when I was alone with her during the interview.
Using this "we" inevitably infers that psychiatrists Pinel, no doubt feeling the hot soup from the judicious intervention of Dr. Pierre Mailloux, got together with Dr. Bedard-Charrette and Director of Professional Services, Dr. Jocelyn Aubut to the Pinel Institute can try and restore its image. And despite that he was already too late about the possibility of a civil order of $ 2 million by myself, for obstructing justice and making false expertise to unlawfully deprive a person for 20 months since the end of the taint reputation, honor and dignity of an honest citizen wishing only trying to protect the public as part of her current job.
Furthermore, I also suspect that the act of Judge Rolande Matte was carefully planned and in order to return the favor to the Pinel Institute in exchange for expert-controlled container in the past by Court of Quebec to preserve and immunity from the Justice Sophie Bourque.
As for the ability to appear as such, the psychiatrist Bedard-Charrette show finally understand, as Dr. Mailloux, what his colleagues have never shown by cons want to include within their " expertise "respectively: the criteria are the ability to appear enunciated in Steele v. Queen of the Supreme Court of Canada, and in that sense it affirms:
"He understands the respective roles of judge, jury, and as the prosecutor. It is able to distinguish the arguments available. It would be able to testify, if necessary, although obviously angry, it is likely that gentleman carried away by his remarks, which appear to us far more dependent on the structure of his personality as the existence in him a delusional disorder of a register. Thus, there is no cons-psychiatric indication that Mr. Bedard to appear. "
Finally, the psychiatrist completes its expertise by saying peninsula is normal for a person with a personality and respect for her himself, starts angry after 32 months of unnecessary detention, 20 months in a psychiatric institute.
Bravo Ms. Bédard-Charrette probably do you, the opposite of your colleagues is a trial and a good analytical mind. Perhaps somewhat in jest, is it not related to the fact that there are in your name Bedard compound. As I mentioned, moreover, to Mr. Gaetan Bourassa, the one who claimed to have made my duties during this time. The latter was found also very funny in all the circumstances, laughing, for cons, well the yellow out of a performance, say many ordinary share.
0 comments:
Post a Comment