sensitive and careful with people wanting to remain skeptical or because they prefer to believe, despite rumors of more invasive circulating that the Justice is still well managed by those who work there! ?
Because after reading this article, your desire to consult a lawyer so that it makes your rights could disappear forever in support of the Jean Paquet, President of the Bar Disciplinary Board Quebec, for its part, decided to hasten the death of the profession by threatening to get even the survival of Quebec's professional system which, to date, makes it live and more. In fact
Me Paquet, lives at the expense of professional members of the professional letting everything pass almost on the practice of members wormy "his" professional order; is one of the bar. The turpitude of the Disciplinary Board Bar d. ..
Imagine the scope of its indecency and that of her 2 sidekicks seated to his left and right and appears to be, in addition, very proud to practice LAW and watching, without saying a word, their mentor s carry out or should I say run them unconsciously to be believed! ?
3 lawyers who want this way to show others the way to go and get that way in unemployment and swelled the ranks of welfare recipients paid from the budget Ministry of Employment and Social Solidarity! ?
So it's probably in this way that Charest and his right arm Dupuis decided to show solidarity towards their "friends" like-minded lawyers they? ?
Friday, April 24, 2009, 8:45 am. I am running as planned in the Office of 'Legal Aid Repentigny "after I submitted the day before mid-afternoon and being told by a receptionist that Mrs. Harvey, paralegals and handles such requests, would not immediately proceed to the execution of it: either the sending Subpoenas to 9 of my witnesses necessary to defend me from my full trial beginning April 27 with jury selection. I also remind him to refute the argument that she clumsily tries to make me go, I'm not too late because the Code of Civil Procedure gives me 3 full days to deliver a subpoena by bailiff to a witness before the proposed date of his appearance.
12 lawyers named in the list as my immediate area is that of CHARLEMAGNE / LEGARDEUR / REPENTIGNY / The EPHIPHANIE and handed to me by Nathalie Harvey, technician right to the use of " Help Legal Repentigny. "
Sensing my impatience that had voluntarily worked so rudely, without doubt, I get angry and take them on the sly chuckle of satisfaction of work well done, Benoit Charbonneau, Director of Legal Aid of Repentigny and Me Diane Roux office of the "Legal Aid Joliette" and his secretary named Claude (who has not wanted to reveal his last name and now I understand why) showed me another example of this "solidarity" ! ?
For it was now up to me the responsibility to find me a criminal lawyer has informed me that after Mrs Harvey receuillir me have the information needed to complete my request for "legal aid" and made me sign it, and taught me more than the "Legal Aid Repentigny" could do for itself Non-criminal lawyer at their jobs?
But it really takes me an idiot so suddenly?
Because I did sign an application for "Legal Aid" and the charges thereof once signed by the applicant is then reimbursed by taxpayers' money Quebecois shake yet the belt rounds by double these days to get to pay for everything.
Why do taxpayers pay for a service the technician told me right after she is unable to make? ? You follow me?
And why is it so important that it is absolutely a criminal lawyer who signs the bottom of a document called a "subpoena"? While the form itself is available online at several sites legal for us to understand how simple and sending a subpoena to court to summon witnesses we need to be heard and to ensure its defense in full compliance with the provisions of Article 23 of the Quebec Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
thing led to another, taken aback the relevance of the questions I raised with some authority and even anger subdued despite the enormity of the harm that other collusively tried to make me suffer again and make me miss this important meeting with the law expected for nearly 3 years, they lead director, Mr. Benoît Charbonneau me back to her immediate supervisor, Diane Roux office of "Legal Aid of Joliette, thus confirming to me, and by inference, he filled an obvious order by refusing at first to make me the requested service. For why have already predetermined that contact with her supervisor to complete an application as simple as that to produce " subpoenas?
I leave the office of Mr. Charbonneau, who is outraged that even I do not understand, and therefore am trying to get in touch with this lady Roux question.Car I did not phone home; the severity of my arbitrary detention like me positioned in a precarious financial situation and I am not yet able to pay the bill for an account of nearly $ 600.00 Bell Canada that has accumulated during my detention absurd and non-justified and that would allow me to put my line in service. So that whenever I use a phone that costs me $ 0.50 and I must reckon with the $ 708.00/mois recently $ 120.00 plus through the intervention of Doc Mailloux was the first psychiatrist I met that concern was expressed about whether I was able to come and pay me at least 2 meals a day since I found that it costs me my rent $ 585.00 / month . Is thus to ensure peace of mind about my needs strictly essential.
Imagine Doc Mailloux, one that almost everyone he criticizes his opinions say controversial, was the first doctor so in 4 years of misery, to worry about my sanity despite my 20 months spent force at Pinel.
It is not I think his views are controversial but the state of unbridled practice of psychiatry that he, at least try to recover from his strong opinions and his courage to call into doubt the opinions of some of his brothers and sisters judge objectively when they simply have no moral sense. Not even need to have extensive knowledge of "science" of psychiatry to notice more, so all this has been easy observation.
therefore appeal to the First Lady Roux in question: The receptionist refused to accept long distance charges that Mr. Charbonneau forces me to stay. It starts well because she hangs up the nose that I had no time to explain as if she had been advised that I call and he was driven to do so may order increase my frustration and challenge me so maybe I come to say things they would like all together at this stage that I run and thus they can be noted.
I remind the receptionist and told Bell that "Legal Aid" has an obligation to accept a Initially the cost of an applicant for legal aid because theoretically we are talking here about aid even though in reality it regularly obstruction of justice that brings the government service to the poorest of our society in a cool taxpayers.
And I speak knowingly. Believe me. My experience with me almost incredible Gaetan Bourassa, director of the "Legal Aid of Montreal, and asked me to take my code of civil procedure to drain because there was no point in his opinion, is the best evidence.
Second call, the lady at the end of the line that I could identify accepts Finally the call charges and put me in touch with the secretary of Mrs. Roux, a lady named Claude. We are made in the late morning.
I thought that the Legal Aid Board in Repentigny had convened early in the morning knowing full well that my subpoenas absolutely had to be transported by a bailiff in the afternoon so they can be delivered time and I finally told myself I was dealing with people of good faith who argue the law as it should in any way to do considering that taxpayers, once again, pay them exactly why.
Moreover, I had to wait Rouillier provide me the name of the witness secret member of the OIQ which he did revealed the names during the conference of 3 April 2009 in respect of judicial principles, however, long-established as to the obligations of the prosecutor. By inference, therefore, everything that bringing in stupid Rouillier therefore had received the prior approval of the "judge" Mongeau behind the scenes that shows me to have learned nothing from his experience of the first trial that he chaired in December 2005 I taking again to a "Tarla" and the shame he has withdrawn himself complacently believing or believing certain other persons important with big checkbooks or brown envelopes passed quietly in his gallery.
For how a judge could act as pocket or unsightly to the judiciary and try to make me believe that he will accept nothing in return that? Let
-so, I'm not a bag with handles in the back, me!
Rouillier not ultimately never provided me this name so I can prepare myself properly as yet he had ordered the Justice Mongeau (one time a judge so that no one begins to seriously doubt his integrity has not choice) to do so.
Therefore, Rouillier was therefore in contempt of the order of verbal Mongeau and acting like I did or at the last minute, I acted really good prince anyway because maybe that his surprise witness in question was the engineer Pierre Sicotte is the one who initiated this circus just not taking his hole in July 2003 when I asked the trustee Louis Tremblay of the OIQ to initiate an investigation into his practice to say the least questionable. Thus, I avoided even in this way a further humiliation to Sicotte and obviating be delivered to him two subpoenas: one by the Crown and another for myself is to tell the accused ? So
and return to our "caregivers" of the "Legal Aid", Madame Claude de Joliette I finally hung up the line at nose when I told her that I could possibly acknowledge it as Roux, her boss, obstruction of justice if she continued to make me believe that she was able to do anything for me even though I reminded him that the Regional Office of Joliette had lawyers criminal lawyers to their jobs, if this is just a name with such a title at the bottom of the document that was missing to complete my application, however legitimate mailing 9 subpoenas or summons. Penalty
lost, I had only one solution is to split the cost of service of these subpoenas famous for taxpayers is to try to find me a lawyer criminal lawyer willing to simply affix his signature at the bottom of 9 subpoenas.
So I evaluated the work of filling the subpoena could easily be done by a legal secretary and even the receptionist of any law firm so this was a simple act that Mr. Paquet could qualify again intra-jurisdictional because so ridiculously beyond the control the award of the Disciplinary Board and as all have refused me the service very simple yet asked.
And I needed to evaluated a lawyer-criminologist to affix his signature to 9 5 seconds per signature for a grand total of 45 seconds of his precious time.
Here are the answers to $ 0.50 each I have received passing through the list of names 12 that Ms. Harvey had provided for me to believe and to fill the legal aid mandate that I have yet signed:
Claude Ducharme (no answer or answering machine)
Me Norman Savoie (in training by the Law Society because it is the annual conference of the Society it seems)
Me Danielle Bedard (his office is closed I- she learned)
Alain Séguin (voicemail, no secretary to serve its customers seems to be: very important to her clientele for the shadowy Mr. Seguin)
Claude Bergeron (can not too busy, I learned there: the lawyer, who had another good time also disappointed by his total lack of integrity, must do a lot of money because when even time of 40 seconds in a day is indeed one is too strong even busy)
& Ratelle Ratelle ; the largest law firm in Repentigny unless I believe (without exception, went on training by the Society, will tell me the still nice receptionist) was formed in large Ratelle Ratelle &! And to the point of disrespect towards customers we serve probably fine. But they learn so that these courses Bar? The art of "jerk" the honest citizen?
Jean-Philippe Simard (a young lawyer who promised yet because it made me appreciate one day service but also in a "follower" has decided to get trained by the Law Society? !)
Christine Goyette Me (... and his colleague who also attended ... she asked me almost one day to sell my sofa to be able to pay inflated fees ... and then I ' were already at that time without the sub)
Michel Carignan (one day ... who has tried to break into politics ... municipal, provincial, federal ... anything as long as it eventually it pays dividends in personal damn it ... because this Carignan me one day I flew plumb making me his secretary sign an insidious white discharge and subsequently being excused by a union member of the Society became a judge later ... which does not even wanted to look on my recommendation, his account fidei-commis )
For this Michel Carignan was there at his office in the Rue Notre-Dame Repentigny when I also joined the cost of $ 0.50 and said through his paralegal seems like in his job, he had not no time to devote 45 seconds that take the act of affixing his claw at the bottom of 9 subpoenas and has probably chuckled to turn pleasure to refuse service court asked the benefit of his own favorite villains when he had supposedly seen in my interests, so he said, when the trustee Louis Tremblay of OIQ came to me meet at my office in the rue Cherrier Repentigny in August 2003 with the Taking my complaint. A nice hypocrite dangerous than Carignan that has the air of nothing: so much so that we do not even wary of him.
Because after reading this article, your desire to consult a lawyer so that it makes your rights could disappear forever in support of the Jean Paquet, President of the Bar Disciplinary Board Quebec, for its part, decided to hasten the death of the profession by threatening to get even the survival of Quebec's professional system which, to date, makes it live and more. In fact
Me Paquet, lives at the expense of professional members of the professional letting everything pass almost on the practice of members wormy "his" professional order; is one of the bar. The turpitude of the Disciplinary Board Bar d. ..
Imagine the scope of its indecency and that of her 2 sidekicks seated to his left and right and appears to be, in addition, very proud to practice LAW and watching, without saying a word, their mentor s carry out or should I say run them unconsciously to be believed! ?
3 lawyers who want this way to show others the way to go and get that way in unemployment and swelled the ranks of welfare recipients paid from the budget Ministry of Employment and Social Solidarity! ?
So it's probably in this way that Charest and his right arm Dupuis decided to show solidarity towards their "friends" like-minded lawyers they? ?
Friday, April 24, 2009, 8:45 am. I am running as planned in the Office of 'Legal Aid Repentigny "after I submitted the day before mid-afternoon and being told by a receptionist that Mrs. Harvey, paralegals and handles such requests, would not immediately proceed to the execution of it: either the sending Subpoenas to 9 of my witnesses necessary to defend me from my full trial beginning April 27 with jury selection. I also remind him to refute the argument that she clumsily tries to make me go, I'm not too late because the Code of Civil Procedure gives me 3 full days to deliver a subpoena by bailiff to a witness before the proposed date of his appearance.
12 lawyers named in the list as my immediate area is that of CHARLEMAGNE / LEGARDEUR / REPENTIGNY / The EPHIPHANIE and handed to me by Nathalie Harvey, technician right to the use of " Help Legal Repentigny. "
Sensing my impatience that had voluntarily worked so rudely, without doubt, I get angry and take them on the sly chuckle of satisfaction of work well done, Benoit Charbonneau, Director of Legal Aid of Repentigny and Me Diane Roux office of the "Legal Aid Joliette" and his secretary named Claude (who has not wanted to reveal his last name and now I understand why) showed me another example of this "solidarity" ! ?
For it was now up to me the responsibility to find me a criminal lawyer has informed me that after Mrs Harvey receuillir me have the information needed to complete my request for "legal aid" and made me sign it, and taught me more than the "Legal Aid Repentigny" could do for itself Non-criminal lawyer at their jobs?
But it really takes me an idiot so suddenly?
Because I did sign an application for "Legal Aid" and the charges thereof once signed by the applicant is then reimbursed by taxpayers' money Quebecois shake yet the belt rounds by double these days to get to pay for everything.
Why do taxpayers pay for a service the technician told me right after she is unable to make? ? You follow me?
And why is it so important that it is absolutely a criminal lawyer who signs the bottom of a document called a "subpoena"? While the form itself is available online at several sites legal for us to understand how simple and sending a subpoena to court to summon witnesses we need to be heard and to ensure its defense in full compliance with the provisions of Article 23 of the Quebec Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
thing led to another, taken aback the relevance of the questions I raised with some authority and even anger subdued despite the enormity of the harm that other collusively tried to make me suffer again and make me miss this important meeting with the law expected for nearly 3 years, they lead director, Mr. Benoît Charbonneau me back to her immediate supervisor, Diane Roux office of "Legal Aid of Joliette, thus confirming to me, and by inference, he filled an obvious order by refusing at first to make me the requested service. For why have already predetermined that contact with her supervisor to complete an application as simple as that to produce " subpoenas?
I leave the office of Mr. Charbonneau, who is outraged that even I do not understand, and therefore am trying to get in touch with this lady Roux question.Car I did not phone home; the severity of my arbitrary detention like me positioned in a precarious financial situation and I am not yet able to pay the bill for an account of nearly $ 600.00 Bell Canada that has accumulated during my detention absurd and non-justified and that would allow me to put my line in service. So that whenever I use a phone that costs me $ 0.50 and I must reckon with the $ 708.00/mois recently $ 120.00 plus through the intervention of Doc Mailloux was the first psychiatrist I met that concern was expressed about whether I was able to come and pay me at least 2 meals a day since I found that it costs me my rent $ 585.00 / month . Is thus to ensure peace of mind about my needs strictly essential.
Imagine Doc Mailloux, one that almost everyone he criticizes his opinions say controversial, was the first doctor so in 4 years of misery, to worry about my sanity despite my 20 months spent force at Pinel.
It is not I think his views are controversial but the state of unbridled practice of psychiatry that he, at least try to recover from his strong opinions and his courage to call into doubt the opinions of some of his brothers and sisters judge objectively when they simply have no moral sense. Not even need to have extensive knowledge of "science" of psychiatry to notice more, so all this has been easy observation.
therefore appeal to the First Lady Roux in question: The receptionist refused to accept long distance charges that Mr. Charbonneau forces me to stay. It starts well because she hangs up the nose that I had no time to explain as if she had been advised that I call and he was driven to do so may order increase my frustration and challenge me so maybe I come to say things they would like all together at this stage that I run and thus they can be noted.
I remind the receptionist and told Bell that "Legal Aid" has an obligation to accept a Initially the cost of an applicant for legal aid because theoretically we are talking here about aid even though in reality it regularly obstruction of justice that brings the government service to the poorest of our society in a cool taxpayers.
And I speak knowingly. Believe me. My experience with me almost incredible Gaetan Bourassa, director of the "Legal Aid of Montreal, and asked me to take my code of civil procedure to drain because there was no point in his opinion, is the best evidence.
Second call, the lady at the end of the line that I could identify accepts Finally the call charges and put me in touch with the secretary of Mrs. Roux, a lady named Claude. We are made in the late morning.
I thought that the Legal Aid Board in Repentigny had convened early in the morning knowing full well that my subpoenas absolutely had to be transported by a bailiff in the afternoon so they can be delivered time and I finally told myself I was dealing with people of good faith who argue the law as it should in any way to do considering that taxpayers, once again, pay them exactly why.
Moreover, I had to wait Rouillier provide me the name of the witness secret member of the OIQ which he did revealed the names during the conference of 3 April 2009 in respect of judicial principles, however, long-established as to the obligations of the prosecutor. By inference, therefore, everything that bringing in stupid Rouillier therefore had received the prior approval of the "judge" Mongeau behind the scenes that shows me to have learned nothing from his experience of the first trial that he chaired in December 2005 I taking again to a "Tarla" and the shame he has withdrawn himself complacently believing or believing certain other persons important with big checkbooks or brown envelopes passed quietly in his gallery.
For how a judge could act as pocket or unsightly to the judiciary and try to make me believe that he will accept nothing in return that? Let
-so, I'm not a bag with handles in the back, me!
Rouillier not ultimately never provided me this name so I can prepare myself properly as yet he had ordered the Justice Mongeau (one time a judge so that no one begins to seriously doubt his integrity has not choice) to do so.
Therefore, Rouillier was therefore in contempt of the order of verbal Mongeau and acting like I did or at the last minute, I acted really good prince anyway because maybe that his surprise witness in question was the engineer Pierre Sicotte is the one who initiated this circus just not taking his hole in July 2003 when I asked the trustee Louis Tremblay of the OIQ to initiate an investigation into his practice to say the least questionable. Thus, I avoided even in this way a further humiliation to Sicotte and obviating be delivered to him two subpoenas: one by the Crown and another for myself is to tell the accused ? So
and return to our "caregivers" of the "Legal Aid", Madame Claude de Joliette I finally hung up the line at nose when I told her that I could possibly acknowledge it as Roux, her boss, obstruction of justice if she continued to make me believe that she was able to do anything for me even though I reminded him that the Regional Office of Joliette had lawyers criminal lawyers to their jobs, if this is just a name with such a title at the bottom of the document that was missing to complete my application, however legitimate mailing 9 subpoenas or summons. Penalty
lost, I had only one solution is to split the cost of service of these subpoenas famous for taxpayers is to try to find me a lawyer criminal lawyer willing to simply affix his signature at the bottom of 9 subpoenas.
So I evaluated the work of filling the subpoena could easily be done by a legal secretary and even the receptionist of any law firm so this was a simple act that Mr. Paquet could qualify again intra-jurisdictional because so ridiculously beyond the control the award of the Disciplinary Board and as all have refused me the service very simple yet asked.
And I needed to evaluated a lawyer-criminologist to affix his signature to 9 5 seconds per signature for a grand total of 45 seconds of his precious time.
Here are the answers to $ 0.50 each I have received passing through the list of names 12 that Ms. Harvey had provided for me to believe and to fill the legal aid mandate that I have yet signed:
Claude Ducharme (no answer or answering machine)
Me Norman Savoie (in training by the Law Society because it is the annual conference of the Society it seems)
Me Danielle Bedard (his office is closed I- she learned)
Alain Séguin (voicemail, no secretary to serve its customers seems to be: very important to her clientele for the shadowy Mr. Seguin)
Claude Bergeron (can not too busy, I learned there: the lawyer, who had another good time also disappointed by his total lack of integrity, must do a lot of money because when even time of 40 seconds in a day is indeed one is too strong even busy)
& Ratelle Ratelle ; the largest law firm in Repentigny unless I believe (without exception, went on training by the Society, will tell me the still nice receptionist) was formed in large Ratelle Ratelle &! And to the point of disrespect towards customers we serve probably fine. But they learn so that these courses Bar? The art of "jerk" the honest citizen?
Jean-Philippe Simard (a young lawyer who promised yet because it made me appreciate one day service but also in a "follower" has decided to get trained by the Law Society? !)
Christine Goyette Me (... and his colleague who also attended ... she asked me almost one day to sell my sofa to be able to pay inflated fees ... and then I ' were already at that time without the sub)
Michel Carignan (one day ... who has tried to break into politics ... municipal, provincial, federal ... anything as long as it eventually it pays dividends in personal damn it ... because this Carignan me one day I flew plumb making me his secretary sign an insidious white discharge and subsequently being excused by a union member of the Society became a judge later ... which does not even wanted to look on my recommendation, his account fidei-commis )
For this Michel Carignan was there at his office in the Rue Notre-Dame Repentigny when I also joined the cost of $ 0.50 and said through his paralegal seems like in his job, he had not no time to devote 45 seconds that take the act of affixing his claw at the bottom of 9 subpoenas and has probably chuckled to turn pleasure to refuse service court asked the benefit of his own favorite villains when he had supposedly seen in my interests, so he said, when the trustee Louis Tremblay of OIQ came to me meet at my office in the rue Cherrier Repentigny in August 2003 with the Taking my complaint. A nice hypocrite dangerous than Carignan that has the air of nothing: so much so that we do not even wary of him.
Too late, however: one might as well try again and I return the favor since I did not persist in my complaint to his place.
All these beautiful people can do to please the Order of Engineers and Mr. Zaki Ghavitian so to hide their embezzlement collusive but then very very shameful for going straight in the direction quite contrary to their real mission: that is to protect the public! Therefore
and all these lawyers and paralegals who have been the order of the Society not to give my response to my request to produce 4 " subpoenas" and my 5 " Subpoenas duces tecum "to carry me enormous damage during my trial that begins Monday, April 27 is next, in denying me this way and diverted mean, my right to call witnesses of my choice to exercise my full and complete defense, I told them
not you ashamed to practice law in this way and think that customers will rush to your door!
backups require immunities, we must believe, when large caps are good to take the silver pants down ... and do not want to suddenly appear after falsely accusing a plaintiff of inquiry in good faith, moreover that the review committee of the OIQ was vindicated January 28, 2004?
Thus OIQ arranges with their many lawyers paid $ 250.00 / hr to jail or even petty, in Psychiatric Institute, applicants who have been investigated because have called for investigations to do? ? ? ?
It makes no sense: it's downright antisocial, for lawyers working to protect such a big mistake on the part of a professional is said prestigious and more! ?
And only if there were none of those who have the courage or the duty to complain when they perceive wisely, true professionals they are, or that the interests of public protection could be jeopardized their professional or the professional system would have more right to exist ...
I learned a lot from this painful experience we want to continue would be to make me suffer wrong for me instead of wrong. Although I know more now what the word "order" means in " order professional! ?
I only look forward now to see the shame on their faces ...
I learned a lot from this painful experience we want to continue would be to make me suffer wrong for me instead of wrong. Although I know more now what the word "order" means in " order professional! ?
I only look forward now to see the shame on their faces ...
"On the other hand, we know from the Nuremberg trials as the reason to obey the orders were not an acceptable justification for those who have soiled their hands by engaging to war crimes " Hermil Lebel
Who benefits?
Who benefits?
I therefore rightly OIQ what made me suffer as a war crime against the human being and the good faith of honest invidus wishing only that the Public be truly protected.
Certainly OIQ well as all lawyers and judges and the media who "works" to keep secret this parody of justice without a name, must ultimately take responsibility as required and pay Note very high resulting in compliance with Article 49 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and that it does happen again by a professional corporation or other entity whose mission is protect the public interest.
Ps: In addendum to what do you learn to just training you Bar receive if a person like me supposed to still unfit, according to Mr. David Bouchard, Trois-Rivieres, scolds you all as much as you are on a question of law ... and then sign for the dish, on a legal act as simple that produce subpoenas?
Casually the "Legal Aid Repentigny" which is supposed to help its poorest argue that even if all live in Repentigny and everyone is happy in his delight of Mayor Chantal Deschamps who in return by cons, does not want to hear about the misfortunes of others in his own little world where everyone is nice and serves it well, to me be made unnecessarily spend a little more 1% of my income monthly telephone calls only instead of going the prepaid service by taxpayers through my signature.
Ps: In addendum to what do you learn to just training you Bar receive if a person like me supposed to still unfit, according to Mr. David Bouchard, Trois-Rivieres, scolds you all as much as you are on a question of law ... and then sign for the dish, on a legal act as simple that produce subpoenas?
Casually the "Legal Aid Repentigny" which is supposed to help its poorest argue that even if all live in Repentigny and everyone is happy in his delight of Mayor Chantal Deschamps who in return by cons, does not want to hear about the misfortunes of others in his own little world where everyone is nice and serves it well, to me be made unnecessarily spend a little more 1% of my income monthly telephone calls only instead of going the prepaid service by taxpayers through my signature.
A world of 'crossers "that's all! a world that I can throw up without having nausea as an individual who considers himself intellectually honest ...
continued ... and please go immediately empty your bag brown ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment