The Attorney General and Minister of Justice said Quebec Kathleen Weil spirit is to demonstrate to everyone that a totalitarian state is indeed surreptitiously installed by the Liberal party to power under the leadership of Prime Minister, John, carp, Charest. Totalitarianism - Wikipedia
By naming last week, among others, Louise Leduc to the position of judge of the Court of Québec, Criminal and Criminal Longueuil, Ms. Weil ensure that its own integrity and ethics are strongly questioned by a population increasingly warned of the maladministration of justice in Quebec and certainly wish that it to be accountable as it continues by meanness in all likelihood, not wanting to do to Daniel Bedard.
Indeed, how can it be first to the throne coveted judge, a "friend" Crown counsel who is always curious subject of a disciplinary process which is currently unfinished before the review committee of the Bar Quebec after a complaint addressed to his place has only been investigated for the least sloppy assistant syndic Despatis Pierre Barreau du Quebec.
Recall that the main issue left voluntarily in disarray, to my immeasurable damage has still not been resolved. This issue is one of the exemption than probative art. 672.26b Criminal Code by Judge Sophie Bourque and obligingly performed in conjunction with the Prosecutor Louise Leduc and Josée Grandchamp which are all based together in the collusive carelessness. Thereby ensuring hinder the normal course of justice by me recognizing "guilty" and then "unfit to stand my trial" so that a jury of 11 people actually paid me (it could be otherwise) June 21, 2006.
The jury had to be recalled according to the provisions under this article 672.26b Criminal Code to decide the issue of fact as to such inability arises. Rather the fact that the jury was not reminded me finally confirmed in my legitimate right to demand that judicial review.
Curiously, Justice Sophie Bourque, who has yet taught law at the School of the Society for several years could not not familiar with the provisions of section 672.26b and Chamberland, and Giroux of the Court of Appeal could not let alone catch this "error of law." Especially, as authorized in this recall rather embarrassing by three judges of the highest court in Quebec them was done on October 27 by a person (Daniel Bedard) who appeared without counsel notwithstanding the fact that the alleged not psychologically able to distinguish or understand the purpose of a procedure puisqu'inapte by lower courts as well as by the review board of mental disorders. Commission maintained at a stroke several million by Charest and that only serves to pay salaries of other lawyer at his other "friends" around them and more psychologists and psychiatrists paid to do nothing except when they need to fill orders this secret Charest same. A household to do with it surely!
In these circumstances, you understand that visibly bothered to turn my trick question by giving effect to laxity of the Court of Appeal on this same issue and this time addressed to Judge Richard Mongeau, J. Bourque colleague in the superior court and tipped to be the one to preside over my trial by judge and jury which is expected early for April 21 next to the courthouse in Montreal, he could not do better than refer me to a lawyer when I asked him the question:
"The failure to appear, Judge Is it a question of fact or a question of law? "
Those who have even basic knowledge of law will recognize immediately that a judge has a moral obligation to respond accurately to a question law specifically from the defendant and even the complaining party and my question was exactly one.
Furthermore, the Minister Weil is not the end of his troubles because it is obliged to dismiss his chief judge, the "honorable" Robert JJMichel of the Court of Appeal following the irrevocable evidence of numerous fraud brought to its attention and committed by the last in judicial processes unfinished appeal decisions taken in obscure court cases that teach me my strength.
recall that Judge Sophie Bourque has again made a controversial decision last January 12 and relax five members of street gang and alleged murderers of the young Raymond Ellis. Young is said without history and that was himself a member of any gang whatsoever.
But it is rather embarrassing for a Court of Appeal allocates as much time to take up a controversial decision at this point as well here is a murder and can not be fooling around with it so long for anything, especially when we know very well that the call is easy to grant right. Obviously sensitive to the fact that Justice Bourque has missed altogether tact and Judgement by releasing the five alleged killers without even letting the jury decide their fate on a question of fact. While the question of law, otherwise poorly framed in his trial for the less confused, remains nebulous for many, precisely for this reason. While
the victim's parents, Raphael and Joyce Ellis implored God to thank him for having made it clear to the Director of Public Prosecutions, Louis Dionne, a close associate of Premier Charest, he almost asked the Appeal Decision J. Bourque, " disciple of Satan " what became visibly Justice JJ Michel Robert takes all his time attending to other occupations, are those of scheming with his "friends" shysters all of his ilk kinds of judgments to be made in advance for a fee secret. Or that of proceeding to lease its premises to its Edifice Ernest Cormier's 100 Rue Notre-Dame in other "Friends" seems to justify its large and occupation and salary of $ 330.000 per year paid by the state and taxpayers thus doubly cheated. This
vraisemblalement to overlook or forget oneself in his wrongdoing, as our national JJ seems he very much appreciated by our PM, carp, Charest because they are more "crossers" these judges, MPs, ministers or other "friends", the more they are appreciated, it seems, by Charest, the dictator in the image of the other, therefore, the Court of Appeal and finally to his own.
Click the next link for a great article developer which explains all the methods of judicial malfeasance of our Chief Justice. What an informed and concerned public should not tolerate under any circumstances since Chief Justice (of Quebec as well) should lead by example. For if it is crooked, the other judges under him will be brought to do the same; orders to that effect may even come from him. This is extremely worrying for the mental health of our judicial system: Much more than just worrying finally deal with the complacency of mine to go on and do not deal with the real problem. My sanity aside, and as confirmed in his Doc Mailloux cons-expertise of objectivity, is thriving despite the magnitude of the mismanagement that has brought me and that impunity continues to carry me. Also, for all reasons:
Can we now trust our highest court in Quebec in the "Ellis case"? Male disrespectful of human beings in general but especially separatists, is curiously not the first time that the resignation of Chief Justice is sought because the Bloc Québécois officially claimed the resignation of Justice ... Thus we must admit that our Chief Justice has lived in wealth and luxury in a time borrowed from the taxpayers for whom it spits back and thank them.
Furthermore, Mr. Chief Justice CDACI Quebec - Centre for Business Law and International Trade engaged in more workshops in his "Ernest Cormier building" of Notre Dame. Magnificent building it must be profitable since our "precious" Chief Justice decided to hear no more calls from litigants in other cases or hearings afford with himself to recreate a semblance of justice .
Long live democracy and the right to judicial affairs may be suspicious! ?
Daniel Bedard
0 comments:
Post a Comment