Is that what the judge found Bourque LOYAL to the other party?
The popular discontent
amounts in respect of lack of integrity of our judicial system. People are starting to wake up and asked for accountability. Meanwhile, brave men of good faith displayed so that other honest citizens are protected from the miserable fate they had suffered the same.
" I'm always curious to see how files that mental illness is invoked, are borne by the courts because I am often called as expert witness. But when a court decides to file" shearer ", this shear''''not so. "
Dr. Pierre Mailloux, a psychiatrist
This statement was said to Mr. Bedard during a telephone conversation with him shortly before the hearing of the it before the Review Board of Mental Disorders (NETE) of 10 December 2008 and to which he testified as an expert so, again, as he has successfully done on 10 and 11 November in the Court of Quebec defend its position and cons opinion.
CASE BOURQUE back of the collar and regaining credibility since the judge gave Sophie Bourque, January 12, a stay on the field and acquitted five members of street gang and alleged murderers of Mr. Raymond Ellis, a man seemingly without history, which was itself member of a street gang whatsoever.
Ironically, it took the intervention of Dr. Pierre Mailloux judicious Trois-Rivières to release Mr. Daniel Bédard a psychiatric hospital at the Institut Philippe Pinel de Montréal projected to February 2010 even before the latter has the right to any trial whatsoever.
recall that this ordinance at least was crazy delivered by Justice Richard Poudrier, JCQ March 20, 2008 in Trois-Rivieres because Mr. Bedard had dared mention the word "corruption" yet politely, addressing the latter.
In the Soviet Union, the last time it was done in order to silence those who are right and demand accountability from the state, Stalin was in charge. Gold, Charest said on another Stalin in power? A Charest, who prevents his new Justice Minister and Attorney General to intervene in any manner whatsoever.
The first internment of Mr. Bédard (7 months) from June 2006 January 2007 was authorized by Justice Bourque following the acquittal by a jury of Mr. Bedard June 21, 2006. I say acquittal because the fact that the verdict be inaudible (as confirmed in the investigation report dated November 5, 2008 Pierre Despatis assistant syndic of the Barreau du Québec ( PAGE 1, PAGE 2 )) is not address Mr. Bédard.
Indeed, the notion of "reasonable doubt" must prevail at all times in criminal law and it MUST be granted, regardless of what the judge thinks Bourque or even our justice Chief of Quebec and longtime friend of Mr. Charest, The "Honorable " JJ Michel Robert. Which, as a dictator, while Mr. Charest said he believes in democracy, decided to close all files appeal Mr. Bedard before you even open it. It is clear that the Court of Appeal, which, however, partially upheld the appeal of the decision the Review Commission on Mental Disorders (NETE), could not be consistent and then refuse all other calls Mr. Bedard in cases pending.
In addition, Mr. Bedard was presented in June 2006 before Judge Sophie Bourque very first acquittal by a jury of four charges of threatening and harassment included in the notice (see article December 8, 2005 Journal de Mtl. edited on the right side of the site "judicial persecution"). Trial in which he defended himself alone, without a lawyer.
In these circumstances how could the judge Sophie Bourque itself questioning the ability to appear Mr. Bedard? The latter defended himself once again alone in a lawsuit brought a denunciation of the fifth complainant and principal investigator of all this bullshit story and had decided, on his side, to go it alone. After
have met with Mr. Bedard at the Institut Philippe Pinel September 19, 2008 during an interview 1:30 minutes, Dr. Pierre Mailloux said, inter alia, expertise in its cons-dated October 14, 2008:
"Mr. Bédard, imposing guy physically, calm, collected, thoughtful, analytical, does not show definitively currently no signs or symptoms of mental illness"
Finally, Dr. Mailloux concludes his expertise on the ability to appear to Mr. Bedard as follows:
"The role of the psychiatrist is not one to regulate social behavior to encarcaner individuals within an ideology as was the case in the Soviet Union but to diagnose and treat psychological disorders and mental disorders, while s 'ensuring that individuals are protected with mentally when it comes to court appearances. I deplore in this case, the use of psychiatry for purposes other than lofty goals that must prevail within the profession. "
Thus, Dr. Mailloux confirms that Daniel Bedard was detained and medicated for 20 months total of 31 months of arbitrary detention of an initiative springs from a decision of the judge Sophie Bourque in June 2006. While the last 13 months have been as unnecessarily redundant to question his ability to appear so that it could not have been more correct.
Moreover, Dr. Mailloux has delivered November 11, 2008 testimony before the Court of Québec to the effect that he had great difficulty understanding how a person accused is said to appear incompetent can have been authorized to represent himself without counsel, the Court of Appeal in Quebec City, October 27, 2008 and plead in his own application and appeal the decision of the Review Board of Mental Disorders (NETE) June 12 2008 to uphold the decision of Judge Richard Poudrier Trois-Rivieres on Mr. Bedard said inability.
In its decision of 31 October the Court of Appeal gives more reason for calling in part in welcoming his call. Click: http://prevarication101.blogspot.com/2009/03/respect-de-lart-67226b-du-code-criminel.html to find a certain passages very revealing.
Dr. Mailloux still can not believe in that.
Below you will find copy of the expert report of Dr.Mailloux.
0 comments:
Post a Comment