FREE FINALLY
DANIEL BEDARD
POLITICAL PRISONER OF CHARGES IMPOSED AGAINST HIM ALWAYS
DESPITE THE CONFESSION OF PUBLIC MISCHIEF BY ORDER OF ENGINEERS QUEBEC
recall that Judge Sophie Bourque, in a ruling Jan. 12, 2009, ordered stay of proceedings in a trial involving five members of a street gang, alleged perpetrators of a murder on the grounds that the Crown had deliberately lied to the Court, in complete complicity with the police and that similar actions were likely to cast a shadow over the integrity of the justice system. Either.
Paradoxically, in an application in revocation of Judgement (Amended) dated 16 November 2008, Mr. Bedard is for the Court of Appeal and request a stay of proceedings in cases pending and past mainly because the Crown can not otherwise having lied the Court. Indeed, Mr. Jacques Rouillier, the prosecutor, could not allege 14 November 2008 ignore the evidence made by the police and then December 4, 2008, before Judge Robert Sansfaçon JCQ agreed that all such evidence had been "destroyed" by the complainant (OIQ), including proof demanded since the beginning of the dispute professional dating to September 2003.
The Court of Appeal did not even deign to grant a hearing date to hear the request of Mr. Bedard even if it was served in a timely manner in accordance with the procedural rules of the Court Appeal and Article 484 CCP (see contents of this request below)
Contrary to the opinion of a judge of the Superior Court (Sophie Bourque), our highest court admit it that a prosecutor or a key witness to lie with impunity before the Court only when it comes to the rights of members of street gangs or criminal groups ?
Why not give the same treatment as an honest citizen Daniel Bedard who has no criminal history or violence? The latter spent 31 months of his life in illegal detention and even wild because of the incompetence of a liar engineer member of the Ordre des ingénieurs du Québec that Daniel Bedard had a mandate in good faith in May 2003.
It will be interesting to follow the appeal before the highest court in Quebec whereas the Crown (Mr. Louis Bouthiller) that the court reporter Claude Poirier has described as an experienced prosecutor with integrity, has indicated its intention to appeal the decision of the judge Bourque of uttering a stay on the field and released the five alleged perpetrators of the murder of Raymond Ellis.
Doubtless Raphael and Joyce Ellis, are the mother and the father of the deceased, have reason to invoke a Journal de Montréal, edition of 13 January that "Criminals have all the rights."
But why, instead of terrorizing a person requesting the inquiry that was merely exercising a civil right in July 2003 requesting an investigation be initiated against an engineer that it had commissioned in good faith, the Order of Engineers of Quebec do not see it instead to protect the public as it is supposed to be its mission?
And how a whole judiciary can work together to support it as much pettiness and lack of accountability by allowing itself to do this lie?
0 comments:
Post a Comment