Preventing violence and crime?
The Federal Justice Minister Rob Nicholson, being himself a lawyer by profession, should begin by establishing teams of lawyers not only trained to prevent and try to stop crime increasingly mediated by the "legal actors" themselves "working" in our Palace Justice of Quebec but also in the rest of Canada.
In this sense would be wise to take a matter of urgency, a Royal Commission of Inquiry into the administration of justice before requesting to be tabled in the House of Commons bills for tougher sentencing of criminals gang-related. For what good is a bill to add to their sentence if they are releases even before there is one!
While in Ottawa, the Conservative government "takes one of his favorite themes" for tougher sentences for gang-related crime "(1), J. Bourque, she releases them even before a trial is held with a jury. The latter would certainly be more convenient decided the fate of some of them drawing inferences simply good! ?
A theory on the inferences that the judge Bourque said the jury during his address before deliberation but a theory that she herself does not seem to have assimilated so it shows deficient in its judgments or downright intentionally biased, not being able to shoot properly his. And to the point where even a secular law is able to notice it himself rather easily.
As the Court of Appeal, I formal and remains of the view that the Chief Justice JJ Michel Robert, no offense to the Weil Minister and Premier Charest will, out of respect for the audience and me yourself, resign. For his complete lack of integrity and intellectual honesty that can not otherwise prevent him from ruling on the appeal of the decision of Judge Sophie Bourque in the " Ellis case. "
Considering that he has "protected" by offering a hearing with himself on August 28, 2006 my query right to the "replay" of the jury verdict of June 21, 2006. And this while I was still being held in custody at Pinel and that I believed, wrongly, to appear incapacitated! Judge Robert recurred later in his "trial" of last May 14, 2008 closing the file and making the reader believe that I myself were personally presented then, once again, there I was even invited as illegally maintained custody at the Pinel Institute in the same way redundant! This is the dictatorship applied even to tyranny. No more democracy. And Quebec did not need an anti-democratic or a tyrant as chief justice. Better still a separatist honest federalist crooked and corrupt!
There still are limits to what a judge is entitled to but mostly limits not to do what even the civility dictates that it is inappropriate to do for the common man. Charest must act responsibly and if he does not lose itself and its credibility with Public who has re-elected in majority last election. Unless it is himself who dictated orders! The inference is even easier to shoot if nothing is done on the side of his resignation as soon as possible!
As for Charles Momy, president of the Canadian Police Association, he says:
" It frustrates everyone when you see people street gangs kill people and get out of prison after two or three years. Give longer prison sentences for these criminals, I guess this would encourage them to think twice (before committing the crime) he has argued . " (1)
The Criminologist, Rancourt who curiously described the decision as courageous J. Bourque (How was it paid to say such enormity and misinform the public and via the Journal de Montreal edition of January 13, 2009?) and Robert CJ of the Court of Appeal did they understand the message?
Hopefully yes ... for ending the carnage that devil!
Daniel Bedard (1) Journal of Mtl., Friday, February 27, 2009, p.16
0 comments:
Post a Comment