Mr. Bédard you today comments on his recent meeting with Dr. Mailloux. Meeting, which, curiously it was imposed by conditions of release when it is precisely thanks to the intervention of Dr. Daniel Mailloux could recover his freedom from Pinel? A place hungry applications or considerations of mystical orders where the routine of making the least possible is more psychiatrists and their entire team revolves around them as blind followers to worship in their gurus. Forgetting presqu'ainsi display at least their real desire to really treat mental illness. One hospital said "psychiatric" where he stayed back against her will for 13 months while in 2006-2007 and following his acquittal by a jury of 21 June 2006, Judge Bourque sent there once for a period 7 months. Without doubt she has done to try to break it. So he can not speak well of his actions her: that of having either hinder the normal course of justice. A criminal offense which, if committed by a person other than a judge, he may "deserve" to 10 years in prison. That's at least what is understood now that this implies the Criminal Code, Article 139 (2).
I'm still happy to have, February 3 last met Dr. Pierre Mailloux, a psychiatrist, Trois-Rivieres, for a one-hour consultation. Since it is not the one who got me out of this mess?
Imagine. This meeting, along with another planned for March 10, 2009 were made possible because the two prosecutors, Mr. Jacques Rouillier Montreal and David Bouchard Three Rivers said, inter alia, as conditions of surrender released on promises to appear again at their respective veaudeville, that I should respect my appointment with my doctor treating , Dr. Pierre Mailloux.
Me Gaetan Bourassa, director of the "Legal Aid of Montreal," that, therefore, that according to Mr. Juli Drolet of the direction of criminal prosecutions and criminal, is supposed to do my rights, has once again done nothing to change these conditions as though I asked him to do. Thus, and because of my own counsel, there was and there will be another meeting. One last, I promised Dr. Mailloux. Yet they are always at the expense of taxpayers resigned in good taxpayers they are.
recalled that the 10 and 11 November, Dr. Mailloux, testified before Judge Jean-Pierre Boyer of the Quebec Court and then before the Review Board of Mental Disorders (NETE) in effect that following his interview of 1:30 pm with me, held Sept. 19 at the Institute Philippe Pinel de Montréal, he has come to the formal conclusion that the accused (Daniel Bédard) not suffering from any mental illness. And therefore, I can no longer be able to appear because, in addition, he will say, I filled in the new criteria set out in Steele v. The Queen. Criteria, although they had already led to Judge Louise Villemure the same Court of Quebec, to conclude my ability to appear Dec. 18, 2007. And this, after 7 or 8 hearings after my arrest on 19 November 2007. Imagine the incongruity embarrassing: I was made to appear 8 times whether I was capable to appear? Are we done this for all those who appear in the dock?
Furthermore, his expert report is proof that not only am I a capable person but also that I am an erudite person: a person, so who knows the laws better than the others, itself being able to prepare its own queries, quickly assimilate new information, just to make a synthesis being analytical. Dr. Mailloux, frank and objective to say that his reasons, he describes me as an individual more qualified to represent himself before the court rather see lawyers as being less able to do because not knowing my record as much as myself.
His report will also say that I demonstrate remarkable resilience. Resilience is a characteristic of the physiological and psychological state of a person to act with great courage and determination to an abnormal situation being imposed against their will.
A situation that could easily take me in a continual state of shock, depression and the abyss of the lowlands. But instead, I stayed right in front of adversity, I stayed right to collective idiocy to protect lies and irresponsibility of people who say they are important. Convinced, therefore, that the truth and not evil, finally one day triumph. And that's what kept me "out of the water," says Dr. Mailloux. So I avoided drowning when I am propelled to power in troubled waters to try and I m'essoufle and runs quietly at the sight of anyone.
Imagine. Psychiatry, as would be performed at the Institut Pinel, try to make people mad, rather than treat them to ensure they are getting smarter. The world is upside down, like what is sometimes practiced in professional bodies, and this is all really hard if the Institute receives, in addition, two grants from governments! !
How can a science that qualifies to be a medical discipline whose purpose is the study and treatment of mental illness, can allow that under the "study" by Dr. Jacques Talbot conclude that I should seek treatment until February 2010 (according to an order made by the judge Richard Poudrier, March 20 at Three Rivers) and another study (that of Dr. Mailloux) more objective this time say that I do not suffer from any mental illness and can no longer am able to appear? Dangerous as a science! Do not you think?
By analogy, and since I am, or was, should I, unfortunately, that after all damages, professional technologist in the field of construction, it is as if my client had received information to the effect that its building required no serif on its foundation walls and I tell him that not the opposite. That his building because it requires a sole collapse one day or another if not properly seated.
So how this study by Dr. Talbot can it have received the consent of the trustee of the College of Physicians Assistant before I decided, in addition, carry myself the complaint to the disciplinary committee of the College? ? Anyone being taken to follow up investigations at the College of Physicians? I asked for an investigation, but curiously no one came to meet me. And it dismissed the complaint, as following a single call made, imagine, against the respondent. At least that's the report of Dr. Fortin and a quarter of a page tells me. Should that its president, Dr. Yves Lamontagne, appears more accountable than that, I seems to ensure public protection.
Dr. Mailloux is a human person, simple and warm. What differentiates psychiatrists met at the Pinel Institute of Montreal. All cool, wordy, pretentious and arrogant. Except perhaps, Dr. Frederick Millaud, which, I must be honest, has at least demonstrated listening and showed understanding and sympathy in my case. What reassures me still that psychiatry is not completely on the decline in our great sovereign Quebec that some would like but I hope not only for this reason!
In return, I do not think a psychiatrist as Dr. Michel Filion can claim to cure anyone, especially not when it comes to a cure for anxiety if There was one that caused me much anxiety, it's him. More concerned to protect the immunities of his colleagues Talbot Wolwertz Morissette and rather than having to simply admit that I did not suffer any mental illness whatsoever. Say that taxpayers are paying him a salary of over $ 200,000 per year for causing mental illness rather than curing it. Another fine waste of public funds, if you ask me. Mostly it involves, in addition, psychiatrists women on probation at Pinel. I just hope for the future of psychiatry in Quebec, they will keep their spirit of synthesis and analysis learned in school and do not désapprendront him!
I believe that if there was only Dr. Mailloux or Dr. Millaud at Pinel, it would not be continually confronted to legal action of the kind incurred by the family of the young Justin-Scott St-Aubin, died of cardiac arrhythmia at November 28, 2007 RDP detention center because it lacked a bed for the receive Pinel when he visibly suffered from depression, I learned the media if they reported the facts objectively. In this sense read my comments for the least disturbing the bottom of the following article by simply clicking: http://acharnementjudiciaire.blogspot.com/2009/02/un-bref-resume-du-prejudice-et-de . html
Also, having still learned things from this wonderful adventure with the judiciary, could I afford counsel substitutes "rave" of the Attorney General that are Rouillier Jacques Bouchard of Montreal and David Trois-Rivieres, and judges that are dark and devious Sansfaçon Montreal and compacts and Tremblay Trois-Rivières, stopping to pay in mental decay and ecstasy euphoric feeling caused by the excessive power that has on other people because one day someone offered us this opportunity. To do so, the work that we demand from prosecutors complicit judges and vice versa for the road dust, dangerous criminals caught in the crosshairs leading to the Kingdom of the Queen, would be sufficient, I think. No need to attack honest citizens and be zealous spirit of contradiction! ? A treatable disease perhaps due to medication. Should consult Dr. Mailloux perhaps?
Because how else can one explain that Dr. Mailloux is identified as my attending physician and not as my doctor consultant to appear on the promises they made me sign of strength? What do they do then subsequent rulings of Judge Louise Villemure, 18 December 2007 in Montreal, Judgement of the Court of Appeal of 27 October 2008 in Quebec City Judgement of Judge Jean-Pierre Boyer, 11 November 2008, and the decision of the Review Board of Mental Disorders (NETE) of 10 December 2008 and taken to the Institut Philippe Pinel? Are all these judges and lawyer (s) spoke after hearing and weighing the expert testimony and then say nothing or do nothing to advance the court records still at taxpayer expense ? Can we move forward at some point? Or does it apply to what all this lasts as long as possible so no doubt prove other posts to "friends" who also want to become judges. For all this seems very charges. The latter seem to invest elsewhere, moreover, the least effort possible to try to understand the causes and they have to "judge" and roll the bank but wipe more than contempt in return from of litigants undoubtedly wrong way?
Moreover, and this question, Dr. Mailloux was certainly agree with me that it was my doctor-not my doctor and consultant-contractor.
Considering that I now recognize that our justice system as currently administered, can destroy an honest individual just producing paper, it seems important now that we agree on the precise terms. A responsibility that must absolutely take a judge, I think. While he delights not to be assumed by the complacency and complicity.
If this is not persecution, I wonder how we should call it? ?
Should stop the bloodshed to end ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment